Hi Christopher, as you were just saying about Re: Censorship....
CC> RT> CC> If you're a known terrorist, you should be locked up and 
CC> RT> CC> the scenario should not aplly to you.
CC> 
CC> RT> For what crime? Just associating with known terrorists, gang-bangers
CC> RT> or felons of any type is not legal grounds for arrest.  The only
CC> RT> possible grounds for arrest would be conspiracy to commit a specific
CC> RT> crime and in that would be very difficult to prove.
CC> Just so I know we're on the same wavelength, would you 
CC> define being a member of a terrorist group to me?
I differ greatly in my definition from Janet Napolitano.  I believe
that *known* terrorists are identified members of a group that believes
that violence or the threat of that violence is the correct mode for
settling differences or accomplishing goals.   
That said, one could be a member of a terrorist group, yet not guilty
of any transgressions.  The group may have done things you were not
involved with or had done them prior to you becoming a member or
associate.   Therefore, you may be consorting with known terrorists and
be completely innocent of any overt action on your own, but you may be
painted by the same broad brush.
RD 
sandman@azstarnet.com - A newspaper ISP - Arizona Daily Star
sandman@brassroots.org - A no compromise gun rights organization.
http://www.azstarnet.com/~sandman
___
 X KWQ/2 1.2i X My hard drive has a furball, my cat has bad sectors.
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------