MW>The problem with your proposed kind of land ownership is that your
MW>deed gives you your rights on the land (which you might like to
MW>abuse), but deeds unfortunately don't outline what your
MW>responsibilities are. That's why our legislature has felt the need
MW>to pass protections which require that the bureaucrats enact
MW>regulations.
MW>2 yes, but 1 is a necessary evil to protect the environment from
MW>land raping wackos.
 I disagree.
 I feel that the more we try to "force" people to do "the right
thing", the more they will resent it and the more they will try to
get around the "force" (law). They will find the loopholes and use
the justification: "it's not against the law", perpetuating the
cycle.
 I also feel that they are calling me stupid, irresponsible, and/or
selfish, when the laws do not, and cannot, take all variables into
consideration, making the government appear so to me.
 Later.
 Robert
 * SLMR 2.1a * I will defend to your death, your right to my opinion!
--- RA 2.02+/GE 1.20 Pro
(1:205/40)
---------------