From: rfischer{at}sonic.net (Ray Fischer)

  wrote:
>On Mar 20, 1:56 pm, No One  wrote:
>> lorad...{at}cs.com writes:
>> > On Mar 20, 7:45 am, rfisc...{at}sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>> > >   wrote:
>> > > > "Mark Sebree"  wrote:
>> > > >> And that is what you want, for homosexuals to
have less privileges
>> > > >> than heterosexuals.  You do not want
homosexuals to have equal
rights.
>>
>> > > >it's not necessarily individuals or even religions
that mandate that
>> > > >same-sex marriages are a contradiction in terms. It
is Nature itself
>> > > >who makes the definitive statement.
>>
>> > > And that is a flat-out lie.  Nature makes no such statement.
>>
>> > Of course Nature does. You will have no progeny. You are a walking
>> > extinction.
>> > No, it is NOT "common in nature".
>> > It is exceptional and abnormal and selected out of the gene-pool.
>>
>> Nonsense.  If it was "selected out", we wouldn't see it at all.
>
>Wrong again. Check out the concept of recessive genetic
>(non)expression.

Which refutes all of your claims about it being unnatural.

>> BTW, some recent research showed that gays are more likely to be
>> from larger than average families, and there is a correlation with
>> the families of maternal aunts.  This suggests that some combination
>> of genes that increase fertility in females also increases the
>> chances of producing gay offspring
>
>Increasingly though, imo,

The opinion of an ignorant bigot is worth nothing.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer{at}sonic.net

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag