From: "Andrealphus" 

In News 1r1Mh.12288$_a1.9719{at}bignews7.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky at
johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:

> In news:6%_Lh.15297$Jl.12344{at}newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net,
> Andrealphus  typed:
>> In News _rILh.25235$68.10690{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky
>> at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>
>>> In news:Z1ILh.14950$Jl.10903{at}newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>>> In News B_HLh.25219$68.24185{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>> D.Wentzky at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>
>>>>> In
news:b5HLh.129337$_73.123362{at}newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>>>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>>>>> In News gSGLh.25188$68.7841{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>>>> D.Wentzky at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In news:hsauv2lvq58gro8n19hp346de5hgagk1bm{at}4ax.com,
>>>>>>> Free Lunch  typed:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:21:41 -0400, in alt.atheism
>>>>>>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote in
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>> In news:45ff283b$0$4884$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com,
>>>>>>>>> Dionisio
 typed:
>>>>>>>>>> John D.Wentzky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> thomas p.
 typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Not if the law is changed,
and, in some places, it has
>>>>>>>>>>>> changed.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> By the constitutionally
required process?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Judicial review *is* a Constitutional thing.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Of cases brought to court, not of laws that were
>>>>>>>>> constitutionally enacted. The judical
branch is not the the
>>>>>>>>> "E" in E Pluribus Unum.
>>>>>>>>>> Oops.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your idiocy is easily dismissed as high treason.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You clearly are ignorant of our
Constitution. Please do not
>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You'd rather me be a candidate?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure, it would give the assassins a real target
for a change.
>>>>>
>>>>> I bet they couldn't shoot me on the Space Shuttle.
>>>>
>>>> Do you plan on spending a lot of time there?
>>>
>>> WIll they have a BOWFLEX with enough weight on it?
>>
>> So, you're going to be on a space shuttle, sitting on the Earth?
>
> You have no concept of weightlessness in space?
> Resistance/inertia would still be effective.

What's holding you and the bowflex down?


>
>>> With more than one shuttle I could order a pizza from dominoes.
>>> Gotta have a television, too, you know?
>>> I bet reception is really clear from there, don't you?
>>
>> I think you should adjust the antennae on your tinfoil hat.
>
> I thought you wanted everyone to have a good time.
> If that is true, then when are you going to start acting like it?

Who said anything about wanting everyone to have a good time?

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag