From: "Andrealphus" 

In News nE8Mh.25667$sC.716{at}bignews2.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky at
johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:

> "Andrealphus"  wrote in message
> news:Gb8Mh.12059$PL.6314{at}newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> In News He2Mh.12301$_a1.5355{at}bignews7.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky
>> at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>
>>> In news:GP1Mh.14719$tD2.6798{at}newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>>> In News 1r1Mh.12288$_a1.9719{at}bignews7.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>> D.Wentzky at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>
>>>>> In news:6%_Lh.15297$Jl.12344{at}newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>>>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>>>>> In News _rILh.25235$68.10690{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>>>> D.Wentzky at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In
news:Z1ILh.14950$Jl.10903{at}newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>>>>>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>>>>>>> In News
B_HLh.25219$68.24185{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>>>>>> D.Wentzky at
johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>>>
news:b5HLh.129337$_73.123362{at}newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>>>>>>>> Andrealphus
 typed:
>>>>>>>>>> In News
gSGLh.25188$68.7841{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>>>>>>>> D.Wentzky at
johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In
news:hsauv2lvq58gro8n19hp346de5hgagk1bm{at}4ax.com,
>>>>>>>>>>> Free Lunch
 typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007
20:21:41 -0400, in alt.atheism
>>>>>>>>>>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>
:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In
news:45ff283b$0$4884$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dionisio
 typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> John D.Wentzky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thomas p.
 typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not if the
law is changed, and, in some places, it has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the
constitutionally required process?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judicial review
*is* a Constitutional thing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of cases brought to
court, not of laws that were
>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutionally
enacted. The judical branch is not the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the "E" in E
Pluribus Unum.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oops.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your idiocy is easily
dismissed as high treason.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You clearly are ignorant
of our Constitution. Please do not
>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You'd rather me be a candidate?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sure, it would give the assassins
a real target for a change.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I bet they couldn't shoot me on the
Space Shuttle.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you plan on spending a lot of time there?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WIll they have a BOWFLEX with enough weight on it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, you're going to be on a space shuttle, sitting
on the Earth?
>>>>>
>>>>> You have no concept of weightlessness in space?
>>>>> Resistance/inertia would still be effective.
>>>>
>>>> What's holding you and the bowflex down?
>>>
>>> Engineering a foreign concept to you?
>>>
>>
>> So your bowflex is bolted to the floor, and you are strapped down to
>> the bowflex.  Doesn't sound very appealing to me.
>
> But, it would work.
> Calisthenics would work.

Well, until your bones started to turn to powder in the constant 0g environment.


>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> With more than one shuttle I could order a
pizza from dominoes.
>>>>>>> Gotta have a television, too, you know?
>>>>>>> I bet reception is really clear from there, don't you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think you should adjust the antennae on your tinfoil hat.
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought you wanted everyone to have a good time.
>>>>> If that is true, then when are you going to start
acting like it?
>>>>
>>>> Who said anything about wanting everyone to have a good time?
>>>
>>> You , I would assume.
>>
>> No, actually I could care less one way or the other.
> Oh.
> Ok.
> So, it wouldn't bother you for roevwade to be declared unconstutional?

Is that how you enjoy yourself?  Subjugating women?

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag