Hello Andrew!
Mar 17 00:56 2015, andrew clarke wrote to Kai Richter:
ac> It can be days (if not weeks) before you're reconnected to the echos
ac> you were connected to previously, and that's if you can find a
ac> reliable system that has all the echos you want. And that's only
ac> after you've noticed your upstream mail provider has gone down, then
ac> waited a few days for it to come back online (only for it to just
ac> disappear forever).
This only applies if you got a single echo uplink. You could set up a second
stand-by uplink for a fast switch-over or build echomail distribution rings,
i.e. each node got a left and a right uplink. The latter requires a dupe-proof
system, since the ring produces dupes to provide redundancy. In R24 we're
running rings for echomail distribution for quite a while and it really works
fine. When one of my neighbours (a major system) crashed during the sysop's
vacation I still received R24 echomail. Of course we could go for a fully
meshed distribution, but the ring is a nice way to reduce the number of links
which brings several benefits. BTW, it would be nice if we could set up
echomail rings with other regions and zones too. Unfortunately some still don't
get the idea. And hpt has some nice features to deal with complex echomail
distribution including zone gating now ;)
Regards,
Markus
---
* Origin: *** theca tabellaria *** (2:240/1661)
|