| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Sexual selection twice as |
A simple argument suggests that sexual selection is generally responsible for almost twice as many features of organisms as natural selection is ;-) The argument compares the volume of information added to the population by each process in each generation. I'll define the term "natural selection" - in this context - to refer primarily to deaths. There are usually about as many births as deaths in the population. The information needed to describe the deaths in a given small period of time essentially consisits essentially of a list of who died. The information needed to describe the births in the same period of time essentially consisits essentially of a list of which females conceived children with which males (along with a whole bunch of information about meiotic divsions which I will consider to be random). This can be represented by two numbers between 1 and half the population size. That's twice as much information as is needed to represent the deaths (minus two bits per event). Two bits per event is probably negligible. Unfortunately, the list of (dubious) assumptions underlying this argument is rather embarassingly long: Steady state population; Random mating; No senescence; Equal numbers of each sex at conception; The resulting changes don't interfere; Mutation is neutral with respect to the resulting changes; However some of these assumptions cancel each other out somewhat. For example, senescence means the death list is compressible - and non-random mating means that the list of mates in compressible. I think the conclusion is fun enough to be worth pointing out ;-) No wonder some organisms appear to spend more time thinking about sex than about where their next meal is coming from ;-) Lastly, I note that the argument ignores sperm competition and failed conceptions - on the grounds that they fall into a grey area between natural and sexual selection. However I don't for one moment doubt that their significance in evolution is substantial. -- __________ |im |yler http://timtyler.org/ tim{at}tt1lock.org Remove lock to reply. --- þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com --- * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 8/17/04 1:14:45 PM* Origin: MoonDog BBS, Brooklyn,NY, 718 692-2498, 1:278/230 (1:278/230) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 278/230 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.