From: "John D.Wentzky" 

"Andrealphus"  wrote in message
news:0M8Mh.15827$Jl.230{at}newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> In News nE8Mh.25667$sC.716{at}bignews2.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky at
> johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>
>> "Andrealphus"  wrote in message
>> news:Gb8Mh.12059$PL.6314{at}newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>> In News He2Mh.12301$_a1.5355{at}bignews7.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky
>>> at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>
>>>> In news:GP1Mh.14719$tD2.6798{at}newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>>>> In News 1r1Mh.12288$_a1.9719{at}bignews7.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>>> D.Wentzky at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In
news:6%_Lh.15297$Jl.12344{at}newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>>>>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>>>>>> In News
_rILh.25235$68.10690{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>>>>> D.Wentzky at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In
news:Z1ILh.14950$Jl.10903{at}newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>>>>>>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>>>>>>>> In News
B_HLh.25219$68.24185{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>>>>>>> D.Wentzky at
johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>>>>
news:b5HLh.129337$_73.123362{at}newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>>>>>>>>> Andrealphus
 typed:
>>>>>>>>>>> In News
gSGLh.25188$68.7841{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>>>>>>>>> D.Wentzky at
johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In
news:hsauv2lvq58gro8n19hp346de5hgagk1bm{at}4ax.com,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Free Lunch
 typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007
20:21:41 -0400, in alt.atheism
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "John
D.Wentzky"  wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In
news:45ff283b$0$4884$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dionisio
 typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> John D.Wentzky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thomas p.
 typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not if
the law is changed, and, in some places, it has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the
constitutionally required process?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judicial
review *is* a Constitutional thing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of cases brought
to court, not of laws that were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutionally
enacted. The judical branch is not the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the "E"
in E Pluribus Unum.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oops.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your idiocy is
easily dismissed as high treason.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You clearly are
ignorant of our Constitution. Please do not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You'd rather me be a candidate?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, it would give the
assassins a real target for a change.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I bet they couldn't shoot me on
the Space Shuttle.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you plan on spending a lot of time there?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WIll they have a BOWFLEX with enough weight on it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, you're going to be on a space shuttle,
sitting on the Earth?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have no concept of weightlessness in space?
>>>>>> Resistance/inertia would still be effective.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's holding you and the bowflex down?
>>>>
>>>> Engineering a foreign concept to you?
>>>>
>>>
>>> So your bowflex is bolted to the floor, and you are strapped down to
>>> the bowflex.  Doesn't sound very appealing to me.
>>
>> But, it would work.
>> Calisthenics would work.
>
> Well, until your bones started to turn to powder in the constant 0g
> environment.

You sure?
They have no milk in space?

>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With more than one shuttle I could order a
pizza from dominoes.
>>>>>>>> Gotta have a television, too, you know?
>>>>>>>> I bet reception is really clear from
there, don't you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think you should adjust the antennae on your
tinfoil hat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I thought you wanted everyone to have a good time.
>>>>>> If that is true, then when are you going to start
acting like it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Who said anything about wanting everyone to have a good time?
>>>>
>>>> You , I would assume.
>>>
>>> No, actually I could care less one way or the other.
>> Oh.
>> Ok.
>> So, it wouldn't bother you for roevwade to be declared unconstutional?
>
> Is that how you enjoy yourself?  Subjugating women?

Better to me than to you.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag