From: "John D.Wentzky" 

"Andrealphus"  wrote in message
news:Gb8Mh.12059$PL.6314{at}newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> In News He2Mh.12301$_a1.5355{at}bignews7.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky at
> johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>
>> In news:GP1Mh.14719$tD2.6798{at}newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>> In News 1r1Mh.12288$_a1.9719{at}bignews7.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky
>>> at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>
>>>> In news:6%_Lh.15297$Jl.12344{at}newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>>>> In News _rILh.25235$68.10690{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>>> D.Wentzky at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In
news:Z1ILh.14950$Jl.10903{at}newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>>>>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>>>>>> In News
B_HLh.25219$68.24185{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>>>>> D.Wentzky at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>>
news:b5HLh.129337$_73.123362{at}newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>>>>>>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>>>>>>>> In News
gSGLh.25188$68.7841{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>>>>>>> D.Wentzky at
johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In
news:hsauv2lvq58gro8n19hp346de5hgagk1bm{at}4ax.com,
>>>>>>>>>> Free Lunch
 typed:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:21:41
-0400, in alt.atheism
>>>>>>>>>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>
:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In
news:45ff283b$0$4884$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dionisio
 typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> John D.Wentzky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thomas p.
 typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not if the law
is changed, and, in some places, it has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the
constitutionally required process?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judicial review *is* a
Constitutional thing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Of cases brought to court,
not of laws that were
>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutionally enacted.
The judical branch is not the the
>>>>>>>>>>>> "E" in E Pluribus Unum.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oops.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Your idiocy is easily
dismissed as high treason.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You clearly are ignorant of
our Constitution. Please do not
>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You'd rather me be a candidate?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sure, it would give the assassins a
real target for a change.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I bet they couldn't shoot me on the Space Shuttle.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you plan on spending a lot of time there?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WIll they have a BOWFLEX with enough weight on it?
>>>>>
>>>>> So, you're going to be on a space shuttle, sitting on the Earth?
>>>>
>>>> You have no concept of weightlessness in space?
>>>> Resistance/inertia would still be effective.
>>>
>>> What's holding you and the bowflex down?
>>
>> Engineering a foreign concept to you?
>>
>
> So your bowflex is bolted to the floor, and you are strapped down to the
> bowflex.  Doesn't sound very appealing to me.

But, it would work.
Calisthenics would work.

>>>>
>>>>>> With more than one shuttle I could order a pizza
from dominoes.
>>>>>> Gotta have a television, too, you know?
>>>>>> I bet reception is really clear from there, don't you?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you should adjust the antennae on your tinfoil hat.
>>>>
>>>> I thought you wanted everyone to have a good time.
>>>> If that is true, then when are you going to start acting like it?
>>>
>>> Who said anything about wanting everyone to have a good time?
>>
>> You , I would assume.
>
> No, actually I could care less one way or the other.
Oh.
Ok.
So, it wouldn't bother you for roevwade to be declared unconstutional? LOL!
This is a riot, because since there are so many people who are pro-choice
and pro-same-sex marriage who like the to declare things unconstitutional
all that needs to be done is to declare roevwade and samesexmarriage
unconstitutional.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag