From: "Randy" 

"Jeff Shultz"  wrote in message
news:pan.2005.01.06.04.55.37.62045{at}shultzinfosystems.com...
> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 08:41:56 -0600, Robert G Lewis wrote:
>
>>
>> "Adam Flinton"  wrote in message
>> news:41dbe6af{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> Gary Wiltshire wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 13:20:47 -0500, Robert Comer
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> He was rather busy with impeachment plus the war
had already been
>>>>>> lost at
>>>>>> home with the help of the likes of John Kerry.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And that makes a difference how? And btw, he wasn't
busy with the
>>>>> impeachment, that came much later and Bush could just
as easily lose
>>>>> the war
>>>>> here at home too given the circumstances....  (Nixon
was talking about
>>>>> pulling the troops out before his second election and
it followed soon
>>>>> after
>>>>> the election.)
>>>>>
>>>>> - Bob Comer
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I'm talking striking back at Hanoi for violating the agreements that
>>>> ended  the war, or is my chronology still wrong?
>>>
>>> Striking back? When did Vietnam ever strike at the USA?
>>>
>>> Adam
>>
>> We did have treaty obligations which we failed to honor, unlike GB in
>> 1939.
>>
>> Bob Lewis
>
> Congress failed to fund anything in that area that year....
>

Wotttzamatta with youz? 'taint you never heard of 'unfunded mandates'?

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5