From: "Andrealphus" 

In News He2Mh.12301$_a1.5355{at}bignews7.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky at
johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:

> In news:GP1Mh.14719$tD2.6798{at}newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net,
> Andrealphus  typed:
>> In News 1r1Mh.12288$_a1.9719{at}bignews7.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky
>> at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>
>>> In news:6%_Lh.15297$Jl.12344{at}newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>>> In News _rILh.25235$68.10690{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>> D.Wentzky at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>
>>>>> In news:Z1ILh.14950$Jl.10903{at}newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>>>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>>>>> In News B_HLh.25219$68.24185{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>>>> D.Wentzky at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>
news:b5HLh.129337$_73.123362{at}newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>>>>>>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>>>>>>> In News
gSGLh.25188$68.7841{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John
>>>>>>>> D.Wentzky at
johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In
news:hsauv2lvq58gro8n19hp346de5hgagk1bm{at}4ax.com,
>>>>>>>>> Free Lunch  typed:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:21:41
-0400, in alt.atheism
>>>>>>>>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>
:
>>>>>>>>>>> In
news:45ff283b$0$4884$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com,
>>>>>>>>>>> Dionisio
 typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>> John D.Wentzky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thomas p.
 typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not if the law is
changed, and, in some places, it has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the
constitutionally required process?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Judicial review *is* a
Constitutional thing.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Of cases brought to court, not
of laws that were
>>>>>>>>>>> constitutionally enacted. The
judical branch is not the the
>>>>>>>>>>> "E" in E Pluribus Unum.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oops.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Your idiocy is easily
dismissed as high treason.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You clearly are ignorant of our
Constitution. Please do not
>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You'd rather me be a candidate?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure, it would give the assassins a real
target for a change.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I bet they couldn't shoot me on the Space Shuttle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you plan on spending a lot of time there?
>>>>>
>>>>> WIll they have a BOWFLEX with enough weight on it?
>>>>
>>>> So, you're going to be on a space shuttle, sitting on the Earth?
>>>
>>> You have no concept of weightlessness in space?
>>> Resistance/inertia would still be effective.
>>
>> What's holding you and the bowflex down?
>
> Engineering a foreign concept to you?
>

So your bowflex is bolted to the floor, and you are strapped down to the
bowflex.  Doesn't sound very appealing to me.


>>>
>>>>> With more than one shuttle I could order a pizza from dominoes.
>>>>> Gotta have a television, too, you know?
>>>>> I bet reception is really clear from there, don't you?
>>>>
>>>> I think you should adjust the antennae on your tinfoil hat.
>>>
>>> I thought you wanted everyone to have a good time.
>>> If that is true, then when are you going to start acting like it?
>>
>> Who said anything about wanting everyone to have a good time?
>
> You , I would assume.

No, actually I could care less one way or the other.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag