From: Gary Wiltshire 

On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 22:31:58 +0100, adam flinton
 wrote:

>Gary Wiltshire wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 17:35:49 +0100, Adam Flinton
adam{at}NOSPAM_softfab.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Gary Wiltshire wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 07:24:56 -0400, Judy Folkenberg
folkenj{at}mail.nlm.nih.gov> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Gary Wiltshire wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>you.  And I would have told you the
same if it had been Clinton.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You're pleased that someone has died.
>>>>>
>>>>>Cool down, sir.  Thurmond was 100 years old...he had
lived a very long
>>>>>life.
>>>>>
>>>>>Judy
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>His age isn't the point.  Satisfaction in the fact of someone's death
>>>>is.
>>>
>>>So Saddam kicks the bucket tomorrow & you'd express no
"Satisfaction in
>>>the fact of someone's death"?
>>>
>>>How about OBL?
>>>
>>>Adam
>>
>>
>> So you're grouping Thurmand with SH and OBL?
>
>Yes & in the same group as Hitler & Pol Pot & Stalin &
so are you. They
>are all people & your comments all relate to celebrating the death of
>"someone".
>
>You keep falling back on statements like:
>
>"His age isn't the point.  Satisfaction in the fact of someone's death
>is."
>
>Is OBL not someone? Is Saddam Hussein not someone? Are people you don't
>like suddenly not human?
>
>i.e if I don't like this Mr Thurmond then he ain't human so where's the
>harm in celebrating his death?
>
>A) Is Saddam or OBL "someone?
>B) Would you take any satisfaction in their death?
>
>Adam

Not particularly.  I would take some satisfaction in their life imprisonment.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4