| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: USR upgrade |
Steven, at 08:23 on Jan 28 1997, you wrote to Jesse Boxx ... JB>> SA> I say, Yes, V.Mach will help, HEAPS... JB>> Tell me more about this V.Mach 43k2 protocal. When can I JB>> upgrade my Courier to this? SA> I dont know much myself, only what I read on the Internet. I SA> have asked USR if they will be supporting it and they dont SA> know (Or aint saying :) SA> I read its more robust that V.fc/V.34 (it would want to be SA> :) SA> Its also FULL DUPLEX (not like X2) and works on normal SA> analog lines.. it sounds better than X2 to me!.. Do you honestly believe that a full duplex protocol that is faster than V.34 on normal voice lines is going to be MORE robust? I'd like to see that... David @EOT: --- Msgedsq/2 3.10* Origin: JabberWOCky CBCS +61 7 3868 1597 (3:640/305) SEEN-BY: 50/99 54/99 620/243 623/630 640/201 206 230 305 306 311 702 820 821 SEEN-BY: 640/822 823 829 711/401 413 430 808 934 712/311 407 505 506 517 623 SEEN-BY: 712/624 628 704 841 888 713/317 714/906 772/20 800/1 @PATH: 640/305 820 712/624 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.