From: "Gary Wiltshire" 

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:53:18 -0500, Steve Ewing  wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:37:35 -0500, Geo  wrote:
>
>> I'm not against the space station or developing new engines to move us
>> out into space.
>
> This month's Discover mag has an article about the old "nuclear bomb
> drive".  I had heard of it, of course, and thought it certainly
> feasible, but upon reading the article realized for the first time that
> they had intended to take off from Earth!!  I had imagined a
> construction-in-space deal, but they were proposing to raise this 10,000
> ton behemoth to space using "little" atom bombs:
>
> http://www.discover.com/issues/feb-05/features/grandest-rocket-ever/
> ===
> Propulsion would come from nuclear detonations at half-second intervals,
> the yield increasing as the atmosphere decreased. The first 200
> explosions, providing a combined yield equivalent to 100,000 tons of
> TNT, would lift the ship from sea level to 125,000 feet. Each additional
> kick would add about 20 miles per hour to the shipƒ ™s velocity. After 600
> more explosions, the ship would be lofted into a 300-mile orbit around
> Earth.
> ===
>

Orion Must Rise!

--
Gary Wiltshire

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5