-=> Sean Dennis wrote to Derek M <=-

 SD> Personally, if I was ever to run Synchronet again, I'd run Synchronet
 SD> v2.30c (as I did under OS/2).  If I wanted to run an ISP with the
 SD> Internet servers, I'd do it.  I want to run a text-based, old-school
 SD> BBS.  I don't know many people who visit a BBS expecting to get a
 SD> website-ish feature set in it.

 SD> My BBS supports TTY (yes, I have TTY callers) and ANSI, that's it.  If
 SD> Stephen learns his lesson from past mistakes, all he has to do is look
 SD> at Pat Clawson and RIP.  It seems that he's trying to turn Synchronet
 SD> and/or SyncTerm into some over-hyped, overly testosteroned website.

 SD> If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

I have to totally agree with you on every point you've made here.  I 
could not have said it better myself.

 SD> (Also, as the moderator of BBS_CARNIVAL, I'd like to remind you that
 SD> this echo requires real names.  You can use your current moniker as
 SD> long as you sign your real name at the bottom of the message.)

I am still amazed by the number of people who still don't realize this
even after all these years.


... Life has a certain ending and uncertain timing.
--- MultiMail/Win64 v0.49