| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: New CO Rape Victim Bill-of-Rights Law Is Pro-Choice; Pro-Rapist Chr |
From: "John D.Wentzky"
"BobR" wrote in message
news:1174496152.551015.115840{at}e1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 21, 11:04 am, "John D.Wentzky"
> wrote:
>> "BobR" wrote in message
>>
>> news:1174486481.500611.229060{at}e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > RAPE is a CRIME and nobody besides the rapist should be forced to pay
>> > for that crime.
>>
>> Meaning that destroying evidence of the rape would be a serious crime.
>>
>> > YES, a woman should absolutely be offered the
>> > opportunity to prevent the implantation of any possible result of rape
>> > in her womb.
>>
>> Destroying evidence is a serious crime.
>>
>
> You have got to be kidding me.
Not at all.
> NOBODY and I mean NOBODY can possibly
> be that stupid and uncaring about a woman who has been raped as to
> force her
to become accessory to destroying the physical evidence that she was raped
or to coercion to destroy the evidenceof her rape.
> to carry to term in order to use the child as evidence in
> prosecution of the rapist.
You afraid misbehaved losers think the weirdest things. Why are you such an
extremist?
Who implied I would not allow medical termination of a pregnancy after the
evidentiary process of discovery were complete? Seems like it is some idiot
who goes by BobR. Yeah, that's who. Criminals are no different.
> You are either the most uncaring bastard ever to be given birth to or the
> sickest.
Your lack of intelligence in no way makes me fearful. Shock and awe, huh?
LOL!
I am definitely not in awe right now.
> On the other hand, I guess she could then wait until the pregnancy
> progressed and then use the
> remains for prosecution but that is also stupid and uncaring.
Got your thinking cap on now, huh?
Who said wait too long?
>> > I am and have always been against abortion and I will
>> > always be but with the exception of cases involving RAPE, INCEST, and
>> > where the health of the mother is at stake.
>>
>> I won't. I do not like abortion in the case of incest.
>> And, I do not like emergency contraception in the case of rape if there
>> is
>> no semen to gather as evidence.
>>
>
> You know, what you like or don't like really doesn't and shouldn't
> matter.
The contest for total dominance of abortion rights isn't over, schmuck.
Right now there is a contest, and right now it is because roevwade was
unconstitutionally and criminally instituted.
> You were not the one raped
How long did it take you to figure that one?
> but somehow I suspect that you
> might have been the one involved in incest.
Meaning you hate children so much you would berate two persons who
propagated the species?
Incest isn't rape.
> Just a suspicion based on
> some of your comments.
Your hunting dog nose must have had cocaine up it too much.
>> > In those cases, society has no right to dictate that a pregnancy be
>> > carried through.
>>
>> Your error is that society does have a right to dictate what abortion
>> policy
>> should be.
>> Your opinion is only relevant as it pertains to what you 'think' abortion
>> policy should be.
>> Your opinion is only one of some 300,000,00 persons' opinions.
>>
>
> And YOUR OPINION is not one bit more important than mine is it?
My opinion is based in law and reason and on the will of Non-traitors.
> Seems that right now, society has done us both one better and makes
> abortion
> avaiable to all without any restrictions.
Hmm. You think so?
It did a lot of people harm already.
>> > In all other cases, abortion is taking a life and that life should be
>> > protected by society.
>>
>> But, in your world there are exceptions.
>> LOL!
>> What a joke.
>
> Yes, in my world there are exceptions and not everything is so rigid
> as to leave the only option of NO ABORTION or NO RESTRICTIONS ON
> ABORTION.
Exceptions is plural.
Today there is only one exception and that is via gender-biased,
unconstitutional policy gained via subterfuge.
> Thanks for the current NO RESTRICTIONS ON ABORTION are more
> a result of your NO EXCEPTIONS stance than my allowance for
> exceptions.
Nah. It is more the work of covering idiots without the public's approval.
> So laugh all you want,
I imagine I will continue to laugh.
> Abortion is the legal law
Wrong.
> of the land
Wrong.
> and the sad joke is on you and not me.
What joke?
--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)SEEN-BY: 633/267 5030/786 @PATH: 261/38 123/500 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.