| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Unitary government |
-> On 14 Jan 09 10:35:11, Richard Webb got back to Dan Ceppa -> Re: American Taliban! RW> INdeed, one of the reasons, in fact the main reason our RW> constituion was written as it was, balancing of states RW> rights, bicameral legislature, three branches balancing RW> power, etc. ONe must remember that we had the puritans of RW> Massachusets, the quakers, all these different religious RW> groups that originally settled, some such as the puritans RW> not willing to settle for religious diversity and tolerance, etc. RW> Getting all the different interests to sign on was only possible if RW> everybody got some of what he wanted and nobody got everything he RW> wanted. Moreso was to insure that there was a system of checks and balances. The Neocon version of concentratinbg all the power in thew executive branch destroys that ideal. --- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30* Origin: Soundly on the Fault Line (1:138/666.0) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 34/999 120/228 123/500 128/2 140/1 226/0 249/303 250/306 SEEN-BY: 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1418 266/1413 280/1027 320/119 396/45 SEEN-BY: 633/260 267 285 712/848 800/432 801/161 189 2222/700 2320/100 105 SEEN-BY: 2905/0 @PATH: 138/666 146 140/1 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.