From: "Gary Britt" 


"Don Hills"  wrote in message
news:76sACtgaX2xc092yn{at}attglobal.net...
> In article , "Gary Britt"

wrote:
> >Another brilliant and highly inspirational speech.
>
> Who do you think is going to win the next election?

Early Odds favor a democrap, only because after a two term President of one
party, the other party seems to get an early leg up.  However, that may not
be what happens.  The republicans are rich with many qualified and popular
candidates, all of whom are better compaigners than anything the Democraps
will run.  Right now Hillary looks like the best shot they have, and she
continues to pretend not to follow the Democrapic line on many policy
matters from abortion to military to Iraq.  She has no choice but to put on
this show of lies, because without it she wouldn't get more than 40% of the
vote.

The republicans have Giulliani, Newt Gingrich, Condolezza, and McCain.
Personally, I'd love to see any of these but McCain get the republican
nomination.

Further, the Democraps seem hell bent on a path of self-destruction into a
radical fringe whacko party.  Its beginning to look like self-destructing
into a radical fringe whacko party may be the first thing they ever do
semi-competently.

> Consider this:
> The party currently has no credible candidates coming up.

You obviously know more about New Zealand sheep than you do USA politics
and the USA electorate.

>
> It's pretty clear that Bush is on a mission to spread democracy as widely
as
> possible by whatever means necessary, including military force.

Not quite accurate.  Including Military Force only for those countries that
are linked to terrorists and the peace and stability of terrorist regions
would be much more accurate.


> In what way
> is this different from the old USSR's mission to spread communism by
> whatever means necessary, including military force?

The USSR spread communisim in order to steal the labor, resources, money,
wealth, liberty, and lives of the satellite state created thereby.  They
did this in order to profit from the conquests, have fresh slaves for their
labor camps, and to compensate for their continually failing economic
system.

The USA spreading democracy does so not for profit but for its own safety
and at a considerable loss in terms of money and resources.  The USA does
it for the benefit of the people freed, and for the benefit of the World.
You're welcome by the way.

Its the difference between good and evil, but these concepts are apparently
too primitive for the modern liberal intelligentsia to grasp in any
meaningful way.

Gary Britt

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5