From: karen vanderhule 
To: ATM list 
Reply-To: karen vanderhule 


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------111D75756DA21D5C1EBA7932
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

All that being said,where would one buy this material without a power saw
being attached to it.: )
Ron Vanderhule

--------------111D75756DA21D5C1EBA7932
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Received: (qmail 3405 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2003 17:56:18 -0000
Received: from aquarium.shore.net (207.244.124.7)
  by mx10.rmci.net with SMTP; 17 Feb 2003 17:56:18 -0000
Received: from major by aquarium.shore.net with local (brought to you by Exim)
        id 18ko54-0006Mc-00; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:25:22 -0500
Received: from relay2.primushost.com ([207.244.125.21])
        by aquarium.shore.net with esmtp (brought to you by Exim)
        id 18ko50-0006MF-00; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:25:18 -0500
Received: from clavin.efn.org [66.178.136.10]
        by relay2.primushost.com with esmtp (Exim)
        id 18kpAz-00015B-00; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:35:33 -0500
Received: from bbad (dialup-ras6-213.eug.or.uspops.net [216.239.186.213])
        by clavin.efn.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h1HHXlX28984
        for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 09:33:47 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: 
From: "Mel Bartels" 
To: 
References: 
Subject: Re: ATM UHMW instead of Teflon?
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 09:25:20 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By
Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: owner-atm{at}shore.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Mel Bartels" 
X-Report-Errors-to: mikell{at}optonline.net X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000


>>>
Has anyone experimented using Ultra High Molecular Weight  (UHMW) plastic
instead of Teflon?  It's the stuff that table saw fences are faced with.
<<<

Yes, extensively I've used UHMW since the 1980's.  It's a cheap alternative
to teflon, having about 1/3 more friction.

Mel Bartels




--------------111D75756DA21D5C1EBA7932--

--- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP