From: dmhills{at}attglobal.net (Don Hills)

In article , "Gary Britt"
 wrote:
>Another brilliant and highly inspirational speech.

Who do you think is going to win the next election? Consider this: Bush
can't stand. Normally, the VP would stand but Cheney has already said he
won't. The party currently has no credible candidates coming up. Bush knows
full well that the party is unlikely to win next time, so he's pushing his
and his cronies' agenda through regardless and leaving the long-term
consequences to be borne by the next administration. Party time for now but
you're going to wake up after the next election with a hell of a hangover,
having trashed your country, economy and international goodwill.

It's pretty clear that Bush is on a mission to spread democracy as widely
as possible by whatever means necessary, including military force. In what
way is this different from the old USSR's mission to spread communism by
whatever means necessary, including military force? (Let's leave aside
debates about the relative ideological merits of democracy versus communism
for now.)

--
Don Hills    (dmhills at attglobaldotnet)     Wellington, New Zealand
It's ironic that people who are too smart to engage in politics are
governed by people who are not as smart.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5