SA>SK> Well, debate is often worthwhile. Constant agreement is not
SA>SK> something  that is. Especially in an echo where debate and/or
SA>SK> disagreement has  health of humans as its goal. "Here, take this"
SA>SK> is not something that is a very bright idea to blindly say...or
SA>SK> to blindly follow.
SA>     However, debate follows rules and is constructive.  The rules to
SA>follow  are those set up by the moderator, who has listed areas that
SA>are off-topic.   There is at least one that I have seen you
SA>constantly are trying to nag,  bully, and generally insult your way
SA>back into.
Nope, I don't want to get MJ back into the discussion. It is the way 
that the moderator banned it that is my concern.
SA>     I think that Dia, while often reluctant to cut a person's feed
SA>for the  echo, has done her job trying to get this echo back on
SA>track.
It WAS on track. Dia just allowed the flamers to destroy it.
SA>  It is her  playground here...you have to follow her rules.
I will, and have been. I'm just stating my concerns and opinions.
SA>If not, help us pursue  alternative medicine...reduce our stress
SA>levels by choosing not to post.
Well, if people speaking their minds stresses you out it's not my fault 
or my flaw.
---
* CMPQwk #1.42* 
--- HyperMail! v1.22
(1:203/1476)
---------------