From: rfischer{at}sonic.net (Ray Fischer)

BobR  wrote:
>On Mar 21, 2:57 pm, Robert  wrote:
>> On 21 Mar 2007 07:14:41 -0700, "BobR"

>> wrote:
>>
>> >RAPE is a CRIME and nobody besides the rapist should be forced to pay
>> >for that crime.  YES, a woman should absolutely be offered the
>> >opportunity to prevent the implantation of any possible result of rape
>> >in her womb.
>>
>> If a fetus is a real person deserving of life , and the result of
>> rape, then you support killing a innocent child for the crime of
>> his/her father.
>>
>> > I am and have always been against abortion and I will
>> >always be but with the exception of cases involving RAPE, INCEST, and
>> >where the health of the mother is at stake.
>>
>> IOW in cases where the woman doesn't deserve to be punished for having
>> sex?
>>
>> >  In those cases, society
>> >has no right to dictate that a pregnancy be carried through.  In all
>> >other cases, abortion is taking a life and that life should be
>> >protected by society.
>>
>>  Why the exception for rape or incest? The fetus resulting from rape
>> or incest is innocent, and just as entitled to force the woman to
>> provide for her as any unwanted pregnancy. A pregnancy is always a
>> danger to the health of the woman. Even in wanted pregnancies the
>> mother some times dies. Why make a exception and allow abortion for
>> some women and not others. Either we allow abortion on demand, or out
>> law any abortions for any reasons.
>
>The difference is one of choice before the fact.

You consider sex to be a crime for which women must be made to suffer.

You're a misogynist, anti-sex, prude.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer{at}sonic.net

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag