From: Bill Lucy 

In article , nomail{at}hotmail.com says...
> All I'm saying Bill, is that there are no specifics out there, so an
> argument against any particular aspect is only conjecture at this point.
> Aspect "A" can be deconstructed, then countered with
Alternative "B" and
> that argument very well may have merit on the face of it, but until the plan
> is introduced we don't know for sure if "A" needs to be
deconstructed. What
> I recall reading about an annuity aspect of the withdrawal phase was its use
> as an analogy to show how the benefits would be dispersed, not as a required
> purchase by the account holder -- I'd be very surprised if that were part of
> it, but I'll not be surprised if there are regulations limiting the
> percentage of the account that can be redeemed each year that are
> essentially the same as an annuity.

My point is that "there are no specifics out there", but there
are those in Congress who support the President's "plan".

Is there a plan or isn't there?

Either way, I believe it's appropriate to infer from statements the
President has made what might be offered.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5