| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | TC++ Delay() function... |
-> The best place to ask is over in OS2PROG (it gets rather off topic here). It
-> depends on the version and fix level of OS/2, and what you are using to
-> monitor processor usage. If it's the "pulse" applet, that
can give rather
-> misleading results because of the way it works. If you repeat the test with
-> a processor/display intensive OS/2 application running, does your DOS
-> program cause any slowdown to it? If not, the time slices are being given up
-> and what you are seeing is just an artifact of the way the
"pulse" applet
-> works.
Just to clarify, I noticed someone bring up the interrupt in a previous
message and so didn't think I would be off topic for replying to it and asking
a question about it. Apologies if I was wrong.
But in any event, the program is causing quite a slowdown in other apps
which is what drew my attention to it. I normally do not run Pulse because of
it's somewhat subjective display.
--- PCBoard (R) v15.23/M 2
* Origin: MetroPlex - Warwick, RI - 401.739.8118 (1:323/1212)SEEN-BY: 396/1 632/0 371 633/260 267 270 371 634/397 635/506 728 639/252 SEEN-BY: 670/218 @PATH: 323/1212 107 396/1 633/260 635/506 728 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.