| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Waterboarding |
-> On 26 Feb 09 00:26:00, TIM RICHARDSON got back to DAN CEPPA -> Re: Waterboarding TR> A person or persons swept up in an area full of hostiles, usually with TR> a weapon or weapons in their possession, or a cache of weapons near at TR> hand, gets taken into custody. DC>Many of those arrested were unarmed. TR> So what! Many gang members on the streets of LA are `unarmed' at the You were the one talkimg about arms. DC>Wrong. Recruitment went through the roof when the Abu Ghraib scandle hit DC>the news. TR> When did `you' become an expert on al Qaeda recruitment figures? You Just read news reports, other than the tabloids. DC>The problem did not start at the lowest level. It came from edicts from DC>the WH. TR> Show me the exact WH memo that orders personnel at Abu Ghraib to `make TR> 'em wear panties on their heads and crawl around naked barking like W stated exactly that in a TV interview he gave. He convicted himself in his own words. DC>The degree of pain/death is irrelevant. That the US deals in torture of DC>any strain is morally reprehensible. TR> Oh get off that high horse! Your attitude and demeanor in other echoes Why should I wallow in the cesspool created by W? TR> Do you think 9\11 would never have taken place? Try something that can be proven or disproven. Your speculation is an attempt to poison the well. TR> Thats crap. Who do you think the individuals were that flew the planes TR> into the World Trade Center, Santa's elves? DC>Of which 15 of the 19 were Saudi. TR> Nice try. They were al Qaeda. 3 more were Lebanese and 1 was UAE. DC>Not a single one was an Iraqi. TR> That was never claimed. Try again. Then, simply by your line of reasoning, Saddam was not involved with 9/11 That makes the attack on Iraq an action based on the lies of the Bush admin. DC>Nor was there ever a connection between Sadam and Al Qaeda. TR> So you say. So you ignore. The CIA said exactly the same. W ignored it. DC>bin Laden is still on the loose. TR> Don't worry.......now that the democrats are in almost complete TR> control of the country......bin Laden will probably be so scared he'll TR> turn himself in. The time to have had a decent chance to have captured him is long gone. W blew it when his focus jumped from that to his dire need to go after Saddam. ... "Where's bin Laden? I don't know and I don't care!" -- GWBush --- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30* Origin: Soundly on the Fault Line (1:138/666.0) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 34/999 120/228 123/500 128/2 140/1 226/0 249/303 250/306 SEEN-BY: 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1418 266/1413 280/1027 320/119 396/45 SEEN-BY: 633/260 267 285 712/848 800/432 801/161 189 2222/700 2320/100 105 SEEN-BY: 2905/0 @PATH: 138/666 146 140/1 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.