Hello Arthur,

On Apr 25 06:21 in a msg to Steven Anderson, Arthur Marsh of 3:800/812 wrote:

 AM> I've received a large (half meg) file at just over 1700 cps using
 AM> V.32bis/MNP 4, but you'd need to demonstrate the accuracy of your

Usually MNP 4 is more efficient than v.42, but in this case v.42 is using
the larger block size, as well as Selective Rejection, which may improve
efficiency above that of MNP 4 (although I doubt SRej comes in here, as
that will reduce throughput). Does sound a bit high though, unless that ZIP
file was not well compressed (not unheard of).

Cheers,
Poe

--- timEd/2 1.10+