Richard Falken  wrote:
>   Re: Re: My darn NAS...
>   By: TimS to All on Thu Jan 14 2021 11:43 am
>
>  > Incremental backup as done by Time Machine allows many more backups. It's
do
>  > with hard links, so a file is backed up the first time, but hard links are
>  > created for subsequent backups. This means that what is presented to me
when
>  > want to do a restore from a selected date just looks an ordinary folder as
i
>  > would appear on the Desktop. I highlight one or more files/folders with
the
>  > mouse and click Restore. No farting about with command line options that I
>  > have no interest in remembering.
>
> Hard link based incremental backups are great. I do a lot of it with rsync.
> There is something worth mentioning, though:
>
> You may use hard link based backups in order to make a snapshot per week, but
> if a file remains unchanged for long, all your hard links will be pointing to
> the same file in your backup drive. This means if the file gets corrupted you
> have no copies of it despite having 500+ "images". I have seen it happen and
it
> is not pretty.
>
> It didn't happen to me, thankfully :-P BUt it pays to run some integrity
checks
> fro tieme to time, or at least have backups of the backup.
>
Yes, of course that's true, one reason why I keep more than one
incremental backup of my system (and they're on different machines).

--
Chris Green
·

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05