CH> Problem is that the "crime" is linked to the intent of the parties.  If
CH> a physician(s) was examining or circulating nude photos of children in
CH> various poses for a legitimate medical purpose, you could hardly charge
CH> them with pornography.  However, if some low life pornagrapher came
CH> across the same pictures intending and using them for pornagraphy it 
CH> would be a different situation; no?
A doctor with any ethics wouldn't be circulating them.  I understand what 
you're saying, but you could've used a different example.
Peace.
--- CNet/3
---------------