Wr Michelson wrote in a message to Michael Kirst:
WM> I was trying to be helpful, and point out a different perspective...
WM> for I detected a smidgen of acrimony in your missive.  Regarding the
WM> "Restriction", I am indeed surprised that you speak this way, when
WM> it seems that you were  the one who delivered "The Warning" on the
WM> echo, midst the echo's normal  discussions.
It is my practice to give out usually two or three warnings prior to taking 
any "action" with the sysop (or feed point).  Since not everyone has netmail 
access, there is no way to guarantee that a person would receive a netmailed 
warning.  And you are still posting contrary to the echo's rules by 
continuing this discussion in the echo instead of via Netmail.
WM> Would you please be so kind as to forward me a copy of the echo's
WM> rules, as I have never had the occasion to see them.
They are autoposted into the echo on the 15th and 30th of every month. 
Depending on when the system you are calling started getting it's feed, there 
is a good chance that a copy should be in the old messages.  If not, a copy 
will be autoposted in a few days.
WM> Thank you for your kind reply.
Any time.
WM> ... nfx v2.8 [C0000] ...  úÄÄÄÄÄÄú  wr.michelson@encode.com
BTW, The echo's rules also do not allow the use of the "high ascii" 
characters in messages.  This is due to the fact that not all computers that 
may be used can properly handle them.  And that includes "tag lines".
Michael Kirst
Moderator
--- timEd/386 1.10+
---------------