On 03-12-09, DAVE DRUM said to TIM RICHARDSON:

-=> TIM RICHARDSON wrote to DAVE DRUM <=-


DD>Not red, pink, yellow, copper-toned, black, chocolate, or even green but,
DD>"other brown people".


TR> Ah yes.....all this `toleration' you leftists are constantly spouting
TR> off about? Out the window, right?


DD>Sigh ... In your world anyone to the "real world" side of the fat
DD>demagogue is leftist, right?


DD>Has nothing to do with "toleration". Has everything to with
being able to
DD>read, parse a sentence, and comprehend what one has read. Not surprising
DD>that you and Earl have trouble with that.


TR> No trouble at all. Sauer is typically deeply racist, meant and intended
TR> his little "other brown people" as an indication of someone being
TR> `racist', while of course, quickly forgetting his own well-known
TR> racism.


DD>Do, please, learn to comprehend what you read insted of trying to fit your
DD>own spin onto the words of others.


The trouble with our being able to `comprehend' isn't with us. The trouble is
with `you' lacking the ability to put a sentence together that anyone can
`comprehend' period!


DD>Whether or not Ross has made racist
DD>statements is not the point here -


Ah.....so Sauer trying to underhandedly accuse others of `racism' is A-ok with
you? Sauer's `own' blatant, open-ended racism is to be ignored?


DD>except in your attempts to mis-direct
DD>attention away from the realisation that it has "everything to with being
DD>able to read, parse a sentence, and comprehend what one has read. Not
DD>surprising that you and Earl have trouble with that."


Well then............why don't *you* explain to us just what Sauer meant by
`other brown people'?


DD>Which you have just demonstrated beyond doubt.


DD>That should be clear enough for even the most dull intellect.


TR> Well......it certainly wasn't "clear enough" to `you'.
So....just how
TR> high up the scale can your "intellect" be, anyway?


DD>I'm not the one who doesn't get it, Richardson.


TR> Oh it is..........your racism is clear as a bell! So is Sauer's! You
TR> know...you remind me of Ceppa. You wrap yourself in your racism like
TR> Ceppa wraps himself in his `moral' superiority!


DD>Racism is NOT the topic and didn't even come into my little language
DD>lesson until YOU brought it up.


Who the hell needs any `language lesson' from the likes of you? Are you a
certified teacher? Do you have a teaching credential? What is your past
experience? Where are your `teaching degrees' from? A bonified teachers
college? Or `matchcover' university?


DD>I dunno how a simple grammar lesson (that wasn't even directed at you -
DD>although you can use a few lessons in that subject) got off onto racism.


Sauer brought the `other brown people' up. In other places Sauer has loudly
accused people of `racism' over that very statement.


Yet now, here's Sauer using it, and nobody's supposed to point out his own
`racism'?


TR> Sauer's "other brown people" comment was *his* idea of racism....so
TR> naturally, when he brought it up here, the `racism' comes in almost
TR> automatically. Sauer `brought' it in.


DD>There you go with that extraneous crap again. Earl wanted to know which
DD>"brown people" Ross was referencing. I pointed that out to
him. Which does
DD>not make me a racist - except when you are trying to misdirect the
DD>attention away from your lack of reading comprehension.


You've been a `racist' from the very first time I ever encountered you here in
Fido.


TR> You're laughable! All three of you!


DD>Glad to provide a chuckle for someone with as dismal an outlook as most
DD>school yard bullies seem to have.


TR> Such a comment coming from you, a guy who just wished a stay in a
TR> lockup being victimized by `homosexual' rape on another person isn't
TR> just laughable, its classic `Dave Drum'!


TR> "I thought that Scooter shold(sic) have spent at least a few months in
TR> the federal cross-bar learning about inter-racial homosexual sex."
TR> ....Dave Drum


TR> `School yard bullies' indeed!


DD>Yeah, I said that. So what. If Libby had gone to the joint it would have
DD>been to one of the resort-like Club-Fed minimum security places ... where
DD>the likelyhood of being forced into "learning about inter-racial
DD>homosexual sex" is very low.


Typically......:learning about inter-racial homosexual sex" in a prison
setting is not voluntary.


And for that matter.......anytime I've seen you leftists in Fido talk about
someone you'd like to see in prison....its almost always accompanied by a
comment about being the jailhouse `girlfriend' of some guy named *Bubba*.


DD>Oh, and BTW, inter-racial homosexual sex is not always rape -


Well..............you `do' seem to know a lot more about that than anybody
else. I'll allow that *you* have far greater experience in that particular
area than anyone. I guess `you'd' know!


"Figaro, Figaro, Figaro......"  ..........Sauer





---
*Durango b301 #PE*