-=> TIM RICHARDSON wrote to DAVE DRUM <=-

 DD>Do, please, learn to comprehend what you read insted of trying to fit your
 DD>own spin onto the words of others.

 TR> The trouble with our being able to `comprehend' isn't with us. The
 TR> trouble is with `you' lacking the ability to put a sentence together
 TR> that anyone can `comprehend' period!

I can't help your lack of comprehension skills. What I said was adequately
clear. It was not to the point that you seem to want to push.

 DD>Whether or not Ross has made racist
 DD>statements is not the point here -

 TR> Ah.....so Sauer trying to underhandedly accuse others of `racism' is
 TR> A-ok with you? Sauer's `own' blatant, open-ended racism is to be
 TR> ignored?

Ground control to Tim - the subject here is not Ross's "racism".
It is Earl's
claim to not know to which brown people Ross was referring. I pointed out to
him that Ross was referring to "those other brow people". Which you seem to
have a problem grasping.

 DD>except in your attempts to mis-direct
 DD>attention away from the realisation that it has "everything to with being
 DD>able to read, parse a sentence, and comprehend what one has read. Not
 DD>surprising that you and Earl have trouble with that."

 TR> Well then............why don't *you* explain to us just what Sauer
 TR> meant by `other brown people'?

Please use complete quotes. Ross said "those other brown people" which is
explanatory in and of itself to any with the native wit to understand what the
word "those" means. In case you are haing problems it identifies
a group that
is not "these" or "them over there".

 DD>Which you have just demonstrated beyond doubt.

 DD>That should be clear enough for even the most dull intellect.

 TR> Well......it certainly wasn't "clear enough" to `you'.
So....just how
 TR> high up the scale can your "intellect" be, anyway?

 DD>I'm not the one who doesn't get it, Richardson.

 TR> Oh it is..........your racism is clear as a bell! So is Sauer's! You
 TR> know...you remind me of Ceppa. You wrap yourself in your racism like
 TR> Ceppa wraps himself in his `moral' superiority!

 DD>Racism is NOT the topic and didn't even come into my little language
 DD>lesson until YOU brought it up.

 TR> Who the hell needs any `language lesson' from the likes of you? Are you
 TR> a certified teacher? Do you have a teaching credential? What is your
 TR> past experience? Where are your `teaching degrees' from? A bonified
 TR> teachers college? Or `matchcover' university?

I do have a legitimate Master of Arts Degree in Public Affairs Reporting. From
a real "bricks and mortar" university. So, fiddle dee dee.

 DD>I dunno how a simple grammar lesson (that wasn't even directed at you -
 DD>although you can use a few lessons in that subject) got off onto racism.

 TR> Sauer brought the `other brown people' up. In other places Sauer has
 TR> loudly accused people of `racism' over that very statement.

 TR> Yet now, here's Sauer using it, and nobody's supposed to point out his
 TR> own `racism'?

 TR> Sauer's "other brown people" comment was *his* idea of racism....so
 TR> naturally, when he brought it up here, the `racism' comes in almost
 TR> automatically. Sauer `brought' it in.

 DD>There you go with that extraneous crap again. Earl wanted to know which
 DD>"brown people" Ross was referencing. I pointed that out to
him. Which does
 DD>not make me a racist - except when you are trying to misdirect the
 DD>attention away from your lack of reading comprehension.

 TR> You've been a `racist' from the very first time I ever encountered you
 TR> here in Fido.

That, sir is a flame and I am done with you - and this subject.

 TR> You're laughable! All three of you!

I'll not get into a flaming contest with you.

 DD>Glad to provide a chuckle for someone with as dismal an outlook as most
 DD>school yard bullies seem to have.

 TR> Such a comment coming from you, a guy who just wished a stay in a
 TR> lockup being victimized by `homosexual' rape on another person isn't
 TR> just laughable, its classic `Dave Drum'!

 TR> "I thought that Scooter shold(sic) have spent at least a few months in
 TR> the federal cross-bar learning about inter-racial homosexual sex."
 TR> ....Dave Drum

 TR> `School yard bullies' indeed!

 DD>Yeah, I said that. So what. If Libby had gone to the joint it would have
 DD>been to one of the resort-like Club-Fed minimum security places ... where
 DD>the likelyhood of being forced into "learning about inter-racial
 DD>homosexual sex" is very low.

 TR> Typically......:learning about inter-racial homosexual sex" in a prison
 TR> setting is not voluntary.

I don't know that. You seem to know more about prisons than I do. Experience?

 TR> And for that matter.......anytime I've seen you leftists in Fido talk
 TR> about someone you'd like to see in prison....its almost always
 TR> accompanied by a comment about being the jailhouse `girlfriend' of some
 TR> guy named *Bubba*.

 DD>Oh, and BTW, inter-racial homosexual sex is not always rape -

 TR> Well..............you `do' seem to know a lot more about that than
 TR> anybody else. I'll allow that *you* have far greater experience in that
 TR> particular area than anyone. I guess `you'd' know!

More flames? Too bad this off-line reader has no twit function as my old reader
did. 

... Let me know if you suddenly become interesting, Farquahr.
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49