From: Mike N. 

On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:05:06 -0500, "Gary Britt"
 wrote:

>In Delay's case there was no crazy judge ignoring the law.  No spouse who
>against all the other family members wishes wanted to kill the person so
>they could inherit the money.  Parents, brothers, and sisters all in basic
>agreement for Delay case as to what the injured person wanted.  No agreement
>on this central element and no proof of same in the other.

  I guess I don't get what "your side" is arguing about in the Schiavo
case.  People seem to be placing a stake in their beliefs about Terri as
though there is a larger cause (All flat-EEG cases? no. Patient's right to
die? no   Unwritten living wills? no)   If I am understanding your
statement above, it's not about Terri at all; it's only about the living
and cognitive and has nothing to do with Terri except as a poster child and
mascot.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5