TR>  TC> I begin to think that your scope is a bit too narrow...  Let me try
TR>  TC> to widen  it some.  Think of construction, mining, military,
TR>  TC> police, medical (yes, medical), transportation, etc. Think if we
TR> had
TR>  TC> no knowledge of explosives at all. Shall we take it to the extreme?
TR> Knowledge of explosives in these areas is already available with no
TR> problems.
TR> I have no problem with "a need to know basis". What I would have a
TR> problem
TR> with is information being made available to the general public "without
TR> a
TR> need to know." This is what we were really talking about.
        I dunno, I think most information should be freely available.  
However, some should be on a need to know basis.  For example, explosives and 
how to hack into a system without being traced.  You see what I'm saying?
Peace.
--- CNet/3
---------------