-=> Richard Webb wrote to Dave Drum <=-

 DD> Keep in mind that Wikipedia stuff is notoriously subject to
 DD> willy-nilly revision by damned near anyone and as such is not
 DD> considered a reliable source to any except those who find an article
 DD> that supports their position.

 RW> I know a couple of educators, or three .  NOne of them
 RW> will accept wiki as a reference on any papers turned in by
 RW> students.  THis is for both college level and high school.
 RW> they do not consider wiki valid as its so-called facts are
 RW> not vetted before being published.

 RW> ONe, a professor, will automatically fail any student using
 RW> wiki as a reference in college level research etc.

On the other hand ... back in 1969 when I was in a PoliSci 101 course I wrote a
(paraphrased - but, not directly copied) paper on reverse-racism which scored
an "A" and major brownie points with the instructor. The whole thing was
cribbed from a Playboy interview (footnotes and all).

... Why is it called "after dark" when it is really "after
light"???
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49