| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | BI-PARTISAN INVASION |
Replying to a message of Richard Webb to Dan Ceppa: DC>> your problem is in the fact that the news has been sanaitized for US DC>> consumption. the destruction of mosques, bombing of civilians, etc DC>> have been excised to protect your sensibilities over the dinner DC>> table. RW> YOu have to agree that the military and political leaders in this RW> country took one very valuable lesson away from VIetnam, even if RW> others didn't quite take hold. tHis lesson was that the reporters RW> bringing back the story to the folks at home in the age of satellite RW> television must be controlled carefully. Hence the "embedded" RW> reporter who cannot go anywhere and act independently of his/her RW> military handlers. Note that two independent (non-embedded) reporters in the country were killed when the hotel they were staying in was deliberately shelled - from close range - by a US tank. The fact that that particular hotel was full of un-embedded journalists was public knowledge, and AFAIK that was the only hotel that was attacked. Note also that al-Jazeera *gave* the US command the coordinates of the building serving as its news bureau in Baghdad so it wouldn't be bombed by mistake; a cruise missile levelled the building shortly thereafter, and it obviously wasn't a mistake. RW> LIke most things which diminish freedom of thought and RW> freedom of information this was done for their "safety" and RW> this was the way it was presented to them. One thing the military learned from Vietnam was that they had to control the flow of information. What they don't know is that in today's world it is very difficult to exercise any such control. The government in this country has been trying for years - ever since networked BBSes appeared - to do it; the government doesn't like to have people exchanging news, general information and opinion in a manner it cannot control. Most folks aren't aware of it, but traffic on the Internet can *easily* be controlled, because the US government owns all but one of the root servers in the system - and Cisco is building such control mechanisms into its routers. The technology is being tested in implemented in mainland China, look for it everywhere in a few years.. --- FleetStreet 1.19+* Origin: Bob's Boneyard, Emerson, Iowa (1:300/3) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 34/999 120/228 123/500 128/2 140/1 226/0 249/303 250/306 SEEN-BY: 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1418 266/1413 280/1027 320/119 396/45 SEEN-BY: 633/260 267 285 712/848 800/432 801/161 189 2222/700 2320/100 105 SEEN-BY: 2905/0 @PATH: 300/3 14/5 140/1 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.