From: "Randy" 

s/USA/Iran/

"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:424b3489$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
> news:424b11aa{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Well at least Bush was sincere in acting against the Constitution 
>>
>>
>
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=1&u=/ap/20050330/ap_on_
re_us/brain_damaged_woman
>>
>> Birch went on to scold President Bush and Congress for their attempts to
>> intervene in the judicial process, by saying: "In resolving the Schiavo
>> controversy, it is my judgment that, despite sincere and altruistic
>> motivation, the legislative and executive branches of our government have
>> acted in a manner demonstrably at odds with our Founding Fathers'
> blueprint
>> for the governance of a free people - our Constitution."
>
> The key words in that paragraph above our, "it is my judgment".  He
> obviously has none.  Time to impeach some justices in my opinion.  An
> opinion I've held for long before this Schiavo case.
>
> Then the concluding part that bitches about Congress and the President
> going
> against the constitution was a real knee slapper, considering the
> complaint
> is coming from the branch of government that has acted more
> unconstitutionally in more important matters than the other two branches
> of
> government combined!!!!!
>
> How high does one's blacked robed insanity have to go when they are
> decrying
> unconstitutional action but fail to recognize or even consider that their
> actions and opinions and rulings are often unconstitutional.  They are the
> only branch of government that thinks themselves perfect.  They have never
> made an unconstitutional action.  Never mind the fact that when they
> overrule past precedents on constitutional matters with no intervening
> change in the constitution that they are tacitly acknowledging that one of
> the two decisions (or both of them) was patently unconstitutional in that
> it
> advocated a position not found anywhere in the constitution.  Only a
> lawyer
> wearing a black robe with head firmly buried in his/her self-absorbed ass
> could look at the facts of numerous opposing opinions and construct an
> argument as to why none of them are unconstitutional, or why their branch
> of
> government is the only branch that has been perfect in all its actions
> since
> 1787.
>
> And finally there is this quote you omitted:
>
> "If sacrifices to the independence of the judiciary are permitted today,
> precedent is established for the constitutional transgressions of
> tomorrow,"
> said Birch, an appointee of former "
>
> Sounds like its high time for the Executive and the Legislative branches
> to
> stop the 200 year sacrifice of their independence to the black robed
> unelected tyrants of the bench.  Congress should assign original
> jurisdiction for every habeas petition filed anywhere in the country to
> Judge Birch's court.
>
> Gary
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5