CG> > Even if I won't get the 100mb/s that I had THOUGHT, I'd probably see a b
 CG> > transfer rate anyway. Hmmmmm...
 CG> Is it really that important or significant?  I.e. does it really
 CG> matter if a transfer takes 15 seconds rather than 10 seconds?
 CG> 
 CG> I run my (incremental, so rarely really huge) backups overnight via
 CG> anacron so whether they take 10 minutes or 30 minutes doesn't matter
 CG> at all.  As long as they complete before I wake up in the morning it's
 CG> fine.

While I suppose you're right about the bigger backups being at night, the files
I work with WOULD benefit from any and all transfer increases. I mean... a lot
of 4k movies & videos, backups of 1TB drives, etc etc.

Yes, nighttime backups can go so far.. but I do sit and wait while things
transfer. A lot.

I still haven't went to the network room and put the laptop on the ethernet -
I'm going to... maybe today.

I'm thinking that if, while connected to ethernet, I get good transfer rates
that way I'll just connect to ethernet if I'm going to do a bunch of big
transfers - and I might check into getting the latest Wifi chips across my
entire network so that when on Wifi its at least a LITTLE quicker. If I can do
both of those things I think I'll be pretty well setup.



|07p|15AULIE|1142|07o
|08.........

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/01/05 (Raspberry Pi/32)