| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Xlaxnode versus Binkleyterm modemtrans |
[Dec 14, 98 - 18:02] Arthur Marsh of 3:800/812 wrote to all: AM> Could someone please refresh my memory on the Xlaxnode versus Binkleyterm AM> use and interpretation of the MODEMTRANS keyword? I hope I remember this right... Binkley now does an exact numeric comparison for ModemTrans; Xlax still does things bitwise. That was a change in Binkley, somewhere along the line. What this means is that if you use ModemTrans 5 in Xlaxnode, you have to use ModemTrans 16 in Bink. Jerry Schwartz @EOT: --- Msged/386 4.00* Origin: Write by Night (1:142/928) SEEN-BY: 396/1 632/0 371 633/260 262 267 270 284 371 634/397 635/444 506 728 SEEN-BY: 639/252 670/218 @PATH: 142/928 906 396/1 633/260 635/506 728 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.