On 12/01/2021 19:57, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
> On 12 Jan 2021 19:00:21 GMT
> TimS  wrote:
>
>> If you're one of those who is going to accept that it all started  in
>> 4004 BC, then it would be equally valid to accept that it all started 2
>> seconds ago, no I mean 3, sorry, no hold on, 4 secs ago.
>
>  Why go for such extravagance ? All that's required is now.
>
Indeed. And that is not inconsistent with some interpretations of the
world, where time space and the material world are simply a rather
inadequate  way of relating to the Mysterious All.

A view that is becoming less inconsistent with science the more physics
pushes the limits of quantum reality...


--
There is nothing a fleet of dispatchable nuclear power plants cannot do
that cannot be done worse and more expensively and with higher carbon
emissions and more adverse environmental impact by adding intermittent
renewable energy.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05