Jim H writes:
> Richard Kettlewell wrote:
>>Joe writes:
>>> Thalidomide was 'safe' and 'properly tested'.
>>
>>Not by modern standards it wasn’t. It was, famously, a trigger for
>>tightening up the regulatory regimes.
>
> The refusal of the FDA to approve the drug suggests it didn't meet the
> standards of the time... which have been tightened considerably since.
Many other countries approved it (hence the subsequent disaster) - the
FDA (or possibly just the specific officer assigned to the application)
was clearly ahead of the rest of the world at that point.
--
https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | FidoUsenet Gateway (3:770/3)
|