From: Paul Duca 

in article CVhMh.9887$8B1.7070{at}trnddc04, Patriot Games at
Crazy_Bastard{at}Yahoo.com wrote on 3/21/07 6:00 PM:

> "thomas p."  wrote in message
> news:1174493457.024182.217710{at}y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>> On 21 Mar., 15:36, "Patriot Games"
 wrote:
>>> "Free Lunch"  wrote in message
>>> news:i5u0031dudt15cfca8vhfvap4opceqs952{at}4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:00:48 GMT, in alt.atheism
>>>> "Patriot Games"  wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>> "Free Lunch" 
wrote in message
>>>>> news:59otv2dbqtdocspvvl9hnnu6jd9mk5a904{at}4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:06:33 GMT, in alt.atheism
>>>>>> "Patriot Games"
 wrote in
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> "raven1"
 wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:uitrv29ob3gkte8cf007g2r6fdbkntk5jd{at}4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> On 18 Mar 2007 17:19:30 -0700, "Sound
of Trumpet"
>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Vatican Prelate: Catholics will
"do everything possible" to prevent
>>>>>>>>> Homosexual Civil Unions
>>>>>>>> I agree. The idea of gay "civil
unions" is ridiculous: gay
>>>>>>>> *marriage*
>>>>>>>> is the answer.
>>>>>>> Fag "marriage" is impossible. 
Marriage is only for a man and a
>>>>>>> woman.
>>>>>> It's a social convention.
>>>>> No, its not a "convention" its a tradition,
a heritage, invented by men
>>>>> and
>>>>> women FOR men and woman.
>>>> What do you think a convention is in this context?
>>> A habit.  Tissues are "Kleenex" even though they are
tissues and
>>> "Kleenex"
>>> is a registered brand name.  A soda is a "Coke" even
though its a soda
>>> and
>>> "Coke" is a registered brand name.
>>>>>> There's no reason to refuse to give the
>>>>>> benefits and responsibilities of marriage to gays.
>>>>> I happen to agree (to the angst of all my conservative
friends) that
>>>>> the
>>>>> "benefits and responsibilities" could be
given to fags SO LONG AS its
>>>>> never
>>>>> called "Marriage."
>>>> What's it matter what it's called? Is your bigotry that deep seated?
>>> It matters to plenty of married men & women.  Enough so
that 37 states
>>> have
>>> BANNED fag marriage.
>>> That you don't understand it is both irrelevant and suggests you are a
>>> fag.
>>> It has nothing to do with bigotry.
>> Youir constant use of words like "fag", and your idea
that anyone who
>> disagrees with you must be a "fag", along with your
apparent inability
>> to say why it matters to you; are all demonstrations that it is
>> bigotry.
>
> Marriage is part of MY heritage.  My wife and I are part of a thousands-year
> long heritage.



        What happens should your wlfe want to end the heritage?


Paul

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag