On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:48:33 +0000, in
, Joe
wrote:
>On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:16:28 GMT
>David Higton wrote:
>
>> In message
>> Pancho wrote:
>>
>> > I'm old and it seems perfectly defensible to me. Expecting
>> > perfectly healthy people, at low risk, to take a poorly tested
>> > treatment just in order to protect others seems a tad selfish to
>> > me.
>>
>> I want you to cite evidence that the vaccines are poorly tested.
>
>It's hanging on your wall, or if not then on your computer screen.
>
>It's called a calendar.
>
>Medications can reasonably be declared tested and safe after five to ten
>years. Whatever you choose to assert, the Covid medications (mostly not
>vaccines) have quite obviously not yet been shown to be safe over that
>kind of period.
>
>The *kind* of medication that some of the 'vaccines' are has not been
>shown to be safe over a reasonable period. It's pioneering stuff.
>
>Thalidomide was 'safe' and 'properly tested'.
So Canada and some European countries thought, but it was NOT approved
by the FDA. The battle to reject Thalidomide along with the later
birth of children with severe birth defects lead to vastly tighter FDA
standards for approval of all drugs.
--
Jim H
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | FidoUsenet Gateway (3:770/3)
|