Hyerdahl wrote:
> Skinner1{at}hotmail.com wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:01:03 -0800, Hardpan 
> wrote:
> >
> >
>
>http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2005/02/24/national/a095250S07.DTL
> > >
> > >Court: Man Can Sue Over Surprise Pregnancy
> > >
> > >By CARLA K. JOHNSON, - Associated Press Writer
> > >
> > >Thursday, February 24, 2005
> > >
> (edit)
>
> > OK. This one is so wrong on so many levels that it just defies
logic.
> >
> > If a woman had been MADE pregnant against her desires...... the
> tables here would be SOOOOO turned!
>
> Not so, dear.  If a woman is raped, and she bears a child she doesn't
> want, she is still responsible for that child unless the child is
> adopted.

Wrong.  She can abandon it at birth.

>  Of course, men don't have a legal option to "make" women
> pregnant, nor can they (in the west) force a woman to continue a
> pregnancy.   Men and women have the same rights but not the same
> abilities, and no, men have no right to reach into the body or rights
> of another simply because they sent their own sperm into the stream
of
> possibility.
>
> And before you finger pointers start in
> > on me read the paragraph third from the last again...... The
Friggin
> > courts awarded this bimbo (and I use that term correctly here) $800
a
> > month in child support for a child she conceived through out and
out
> > deception!
>
> There was ZERO "deception" in the sending of the sperm into the
stream
> of possibility,

Then according to your logic, someone entrusting their money to someone
else cannot be defrauded.  After all, they sent their money into the
"stream of possibility".

It's probably long past time that you've acknowledged you're full of
shit.  You're now at the point where you're *clearly* blaming the
victim here, for no other reason than your deep animosity towards men
and your desire to ensure that no woman is held accountable for her
actions.

> and that's all the court is looking at or needs to look
> at in the best interests of children.  If you don't want to risk
having
> a child, keep your sperm to yourself.

And if you don't want to get pregnant, keep your legs closed.  Again,
according to your logic, abortion wouldn't be an option because, after
all, the woman sent her egg into the "stream of possibility".

>
>
> That's not mysogony folks.... that's just calling it like
> > it is! ANYBODY who wants to argue in this witche's defense is
showing
> > their out and out bias against men and towards women!
>
> Oh, hon....women could care less whether you call them witches,
> bitches, or 'hos'.

And yet again you have to be reminded you don't speak for all women.
In fact, several female acquaintances of mine laugh uproariously at
what routinely comes out of your mouth.  And before you begin
protesting that you might not be a man, you're not fooling anyone.  My
women friends all pointed to your derisive use of "dear" and
"hon" as
words that only a woman would use when addressing men like that.

And before you begin whinging on about anecdotal evidence, a quick tour
through any number of opinion sites on the web will turn up a whole
host of articles written by women who think that opinions like
yours--actually, your parroting of radical feminist rantings--are truly
cringe-worthy.  Many of them find Nancy Hopkins a deep, deep
embarrassment, and they do indeed worry about how this will make others
view women.

So, you might want to rethink your generalities.

>  They have the law;

Feminists force unequal enforcement of the law in their favor.  Things
change.  Are you not aware of that?

>  they have equal rights,

Feminists force overzealous enforcement of their rights in their favor.
 In other words, feminists view their rights (not even rights of women
in general, just the rights of women who tow their party line) as being
primary and all others as secondary.  Their rights don't end where
others' begin, their rights just...never end.

> and
> they even have guns.

Seen men with guns, seen women with guns--my money is on the men.  But
hey, you dispose of your disposable income as *you* see fit.   lol

>  What they don't have to put up with is bitter
> boys like you.

The most bitter one I ever see in this group is, well...you.  The
amount of time and energy you devote to doing little more than
"neener-ing" is indicative of a deep malice, the kind that is routinely
generated by hatred and bitterness.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/27/05 1:33:49 AM ---