On 03-21-09, DAN CEPPA said to EARL CROASMUN:


EC> Isn't that a discussion of the posters rather than the issues?


DC>It is about the issue and what you claimed is or isn't in the bill.  That
DC>makes it the problem.


~> is in the fact that those string were there.  Dodd removed them
~> from the bill.


EC> Which means they were no longer there.  Your comment has nothing to do
EC> with the point.


DC>You do realize that Dodd is a Republican senator, don't you?


Aren't you the one who was ragging on someone recently for what you percieved
as their `lack of education'?


I'll save you the trouble of looking it up:


Yeah...you were! You were boasting, in a left-handed sort of way, about how
educated *you* were, as opposed to someone elses education.


DC>You do realize that removimg that from the bill allowed those crooks to
DC>receive their bonuses?  As such, my comment was most definitely to the
DC>point.


You don't even know what party Senator Chris Dodd belongs to, so its unlikely
you know what the `point' is.


Try again!



---
*Durango b301 #PE*