From: "Rich Gauszka" 

FWIW - I don't disagree with what you've stated below. Where we differ is
in how we define what is  'unproven science'.


"Mark"  wrote in message
news:45e78860{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
> news:45e7820b$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Dang Mark - next you'll tell us you are a charter member of the Sierra
>> Club 
>
> I think that'd be a step too far Rich! 
>
> Though I used to read Rodale stuff -- can't remember if I subscribed or
> bought issues at the local magazine/porn/newspaper/tobacco emporium.  seriously, being green is fine with me, proper stewardship of our
> environment is noble. However, force-feeding half-assed unproven science
> down our throats via expensive ill-advised policies from on high, enacted
> because of money/pressure from holier than thou ideologues, is not okay>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5