"Aggy"  wrote in message
news:P%CUd.128$CQ2.118{at}newsfe1-gui.ntli.net...
>
> "suckmysav"  wrote in message
> news:42229971$1_1{at}news.iprimus.com.au...
>>
>> "Aggy"  wrote in message
>> news:vZvUd.2616$556.108{at}newsfe5-gui.ntli.net...
>> >
>> > "suckmysav"  wrote in message
>> > news:42227ea1$1_1{at}news.iprimus.com.au...
>> > >
>> > > "Aggy"  wrote in message
>> > > news:yPuUd.2603$556.2429{at}newsfe5-gui.ntli.net...
>> > > >
>> > > > "suckmysav"  wrote
in message
>> > > > news:42227571$1_1{at}news.iprimus.com.au...
>> > > > > Demonstrating the amazing ability that most
females have for
>> > > > self-delusion,
>> > > > > this ex-IBM exec and now wannabe politician
descibes her stint as
> a
>> > Paris
>> > > > > hooker as "very romantic". I guess
anything can be "romantic" if
> it's
>> > > > > done in Paris.
>> > > >
>> > > > Explain how she is deluding herself.
>> > >
>> > > There is nothing "romantic" about screwing
somebody for a cash
>> > > payment
> you
>> > twit.
>> >
>> > To delude herself she would have to 'believe that what she did was
> romantic.
>> > If she screwed somebody out of a payment then I doubt she sees it as
>> > romantic so she didn't delude herself. she lied. Get it now dear?
>>
>> Yes she lied. To herself. Otherwise she would be riddled with shame at
>> being outed and not twittering on about how "romantic it was".
> Your faith in humanity is rather sweet dear but I don't share it. I see it
> as morel likely that this woman has no conscience and she is well aware of
> what she is doing.

In that case she lied to everyone else.


>>
>> Nobody with half brain and who was ashamed by their actions
>> would  believe for one moment that anybody would accept that
>> prostitution = romance. Not for one second. The only possible
>> reason that somebody could try that on is if they had actually
>> rationalised it to themselves, and come to believe to be true.
> you placed two conditions there. you assume she passes them?
>>
>> Women do that shit all the time.
> Off you go again dear. What you meant to say was, "people do that shit all
> the time". Are you getting this equality thing yet? It's for everyone and
> not just for men. And yes, 'people' do it all the time.

It is quite apparent that YOU don't get the 'equality thing' and what you
don't get about the 'equality thing' is that it is all a SCAM.
There are too many differences (both social AND innate) to assert with any
REAL validity that 'equality' of the sexes should even be a goal.
For a start ALL forms of male chivalry (both personal and institutionalised
forms) would have to be dumped forthwith and ironically this is not
something that those feminists who rant on about 'equality' want to broach -
far fucking from from it!!!
So don't come in here spouting that utter bullshit whilst thinking you won't
be called on it.

Phil



>>Any man who has spent any
>> time at all with women knows that. The only people who don't
>> understand such things are women themselves, apparently.
> Your perceptions show you have no understanding and no desire to
> understand.
> You can't be expected to be taken seriously if you refuse to look cold
> hard
> facts in the face.
>>
>>
>
>




--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/28/05 9:34:15 AM ---