From: "Robert Comer" 

> Oh you're playing that old canard that defending our ideals creates
> fanatics? Even if that were true, tough shit for them -- they're on the
> wrong side of right.

How the hell is attacking Iran defending our *ideals*?

At best it could be said it was self defense -- if they were a threat,
which they are not.

--
Bob Comer


"Mark"  wrote in message
news:45e2552c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
> news:45e24fbf$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> How about E: Diplomacy - It's not instantaneous but your C alternative
>> will just create millions of fanatics.
>
> Oh you're playing that old canard that defending our ideals creates
> fanatics? Even if that were true, tough shit for them -- they're on the
> wrong side of right.
>
>>>How well are we doing in Iraq?
>
> We're doing pretty damn well in Iraq, a helluva a lot better than the
> surrender monkeys on the D side (and a few fools on the R side) of
> congress will ever see or acknowledge due to their shameless political
> posturing for their own MSM driven personal benefit vs. the well-being of
> our country, the world, and that of the future well-being of the Iraqi
> people in particular; the middle-east in general.
>
>> Well it would be a promotional opportunity for some General vacancies.
>
>> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article1434540.ece
>>
>> There are four or five generals and admirals we know of who would resign
>> if Bush ordered an attack on Iran," a source with close ties to British
>> intelligence said. ...
>
> Wow, some Brits say, in so many words that: Bush sucks, America is wrong,
> Generals (five of them of even!!!!) want to surrender -- What a
> revelation!!! Pfft.
>
> And you buy into, as well as propagate that bullshit Rich?   that comedy to Phil and Adam>
>
> Next you'll be telling me to read Sy Hersh's latest fiction.
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5