From: "Rich Gauszka" 

Opposing bombing doesn't mean stand back and do nothing

I make at attempt at not trying to justify actions or thought ( not always
successful ) by a whose life is worth more rationale.  That's a dangerous
road to take and it inventively leads to some sort of persecution

 "Mark"  wrote in message
news:45e25aab$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> If I understand you correctly Rich, you wish to stand back while Iran
> develops nuclear weapons (during same development they're publicly
> screaming about wiping Israel off the map, decrying the infidels in
> America as well as the rest of the west and calling for their demise)
> because it's wrong to preemptively defend our position in the world in
> deference to that bullshit?
>
> I didn't, and never would, call for genocide (that's what they want), I
> asked if it would be prudent to take out their facilities for developing
> nuclear weapons before they consummate same and proceed to use them
> (either actually or for blackmail) as they explicitly say they will
> against the west.
>
> You feel, for all intents and purposes, that we should wait and see if
> they use those weapons, then fight back after a few million of us die in
> Chicago or any other major metropolitan area.
>
> I say that that is incredibly out of touch with reality. I'd cede your
> right to be so out of touch, if it weren't so expensive in our loss of
> lives at their hands -- or do you feel their lives are worth more than
> ours?
>
>
> "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
> news:45e2577c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Many in this country wish to defend our ideals. Not all of them wish to
>> bomb everyone that opposes us. This 'wipe em all out before they wipe us
>> out' mentality has another name - Genocide
>>
>>
>> Mark wrote:
>>> "Rich Gauszka" 
wrote in message
>>> news:45e24fbf$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>> How about E: Diplomacy - It's not instantaneous but your C
alternative
>>>> will just create millions of fanatics.
>>>
>>> Oh you're playing that old canard that defending our ideals creates
>>> fanatics? Even if that were true, tough shit for them -- they're on the
>>> wrong side of right.
>>>
>>>>> How well are we doing in Iraq?
>>>
>>> We're doing pretty damn well in Iraq, a helluva a lot better than the
>>> surrender monkeys on the D side (and a few fools on the R side) of
>>> congress will ever see or acknowledge due to their shameless political
>>> posturing for their own MSM driven personal benefit vs. the well-being
>>> of our country, the world, and that of the future well-being of the
>>> Iraqi people in particular; the middle-east in general.
>>>
>>>> Well it would be a promotional opportunity for some
General vacancies.
>>>
>>>> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article1434540.ece
>>>>
>>>> There are four or five generals and admirals we know of who would
>>>> resign if Bush ordered an attack on Iran," a source
with close ties to
>>>> British intelligence said. ...
>>>
>>> Wow, some Brits say, in so many words that: Bush sucks, America is
>>> wrong, Generals (five of them of even!!!!) want to surrender -- What a
>>> revelation!!! Pfft.
>>>
>>> And you buy into, as well as propagate that bullshit Rich?  >> leave that comedy to Phil and Adam>
>>>
>>> Next you'll be telling me to read Sy Hersh's latest fiction.
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5