In article ,
 "bluesmama"  wrote:

> mark_sobolewski{at}yahoo.com wrote:
> > bluesmama wrote:
>
> > > A man who does not take responsibility for his own seed, and leaves
> > > that responsibility to someone else, when he does not want to
> father
> > a
> > > child, is stupid. Trust, or lack of trust, has nothing to do with
> it.
> >
> > But that's what trust _IS_.  It's about believing someone's elses
> > word that they won't betray you.  It's about believing in their
> > morality and their abilities.
>
> What I'm saying is that responsibility is one thing, and "trusting"
> someone else to take over your own responsibility and make it theirs,
> is something else entirely.

It appears you're engaging in some linguistic gymnastics here.

The responsibility you claim I'm transferring is the responsibility
to not trust women.  In other words, you're saying that
responsible men don't think of women as trustworthy.

Not a very nice thing to say, is it?

Feminists wanted women to have "equality" with men and
to even trust them as leaders and superiors.  Yet,
the moment women get any special choice, such
as abortion rights, you don't want them to accept
full responsibility for it.

It comes across incredibly, well, girlish. :-)

But a responsible man shouldn't be surprised by that,
should he?

regards,
Mark Sobolewski


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/27/05 9:34:00 PM ---