On 11 Jan 2021 at 09:48:33 GMT, Joe  wrote:

> On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:16:28 GMT
> David Higton  wrote:
>
>>  In message 
>>            Pancho  wrote:
>>
>>  > I'm old and it seems perfectly defensible to me. Expecting
>>  > perfectly healthy people, at low risk, to take a poorly tested
>>  > treatment just in order to protect others seems a tad selfish to
>>  > me.
>>
>>  I want you to cite evidence that the vaccines are poorly tested.
>
> It's hanging on your wall, or if not then on your computer screen.
>
> It's called a calendar.
>
> Medications can reasonably be declared tested and safe after five to ten
> years. Whatever you choose to assert, the Covid medications (mostly not
> vaccines) have quite obviously not yet been shown to be safe over that
> kind of period.
>
> The *kind* of medication that some of the 'vaccines' are has not been
> shown to be safe over a reasonable period. It's pioneering stuff.
>
> Thalidomide was 'safe' and 'properly tested'.

OK well in that case, no one had better have it until it's not been used for
10 years. We'll just leave it all on the shelf til, then, OK?

In the case of Thalidomide, it was tested on at least two type of small mammal
such as hampsters, rats, etc. It was safe in the case of one of them, and gave
fetus deformities in the other. So, safe *at* *the* *time* is perhaps correct,
but I suspect that wouldn't pass today.

--
Tim

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05